Are we all just spammers at heart?

Sending a press release to a reporter is a far different activity than blasting a million messages about generic viagra, right?  Of course it is, but as media relations starts to veer out of the professional into the amateur realm and our public relations plans branch out to include civilians who are less inured to the constant barrage of press releases, it has become apparent that we need to take another hard look at how we communicate.

When a blogger ends up in a Cision or Vocus database, they will inevitably start receiving press releases from PR people.  Likewise if they attend a conference as “press,” they will end up on the conference media list.  I think this is something that would be completely expected (if irritating) to a veteran reporter, but I think it’s easy to miss the fact that many of these bloggers might be utterly confused when they start receiving press releases and pitches, seemingly out of the blue.

I was reading a Photoshop tutorial on mezzoblue (which is a great site, by the way) and I came across an entry called “PR.”  What it said was this:

Somehow, and I’m just guessing here, but somehow my email address ended up on a centralized mailing list for public relations firms representing the tech industry. All of a sudden I’m getting in the neighbourhood of 2 or 3 press releases directly emailed per day, all from different people at various PR agencies. This started around a week ago.

The comments that followed were mainly from other bloggers who were likewise confused as to why they were getting these, positing that these firms by lists of blogs culled from the web and one of them calling this practice “the new style of spam.”

Obviously, they don’t have all the facts about how the industry works, nor should they be expected to.  All they know is that they’re getting unsolicited commercial email, and they don’t want it.

It would be easy to blame the bad PR people here, but I think that’s too easy.  Certainly, the ones sending mass emails to bloggers they’ve never spoken to before is a good sign that they don’t understand social media, and probably aren’t that great with regular media either.  The problem stems from the idea that a) the press release is the only way to communicate with that media, and that b) we should treat blogs like the media.

Press releases have their place.  I send press releases for things like personnel and account annoucements.  The things that trade magazines want to cover, but that will only ever get a couple of lines in a “by the way” sort of section.  They’re also good for financial announcements and things of that sort.  Notice that none of these things are the sorts of things that would show up on a blog.  An online news site, perhaps, but not a blog.

In order to communicate with a non-commercial blog, you have to understand what they’re doing and why they’re doing it.  Do they ever cover commercial products?  Do they post reviews?  Do they talk about the kind of thing that you’re promoting?  If they still seem like a good fit, a blogger has to be courted in a meaningful way.  Through a program like the Nikon D80 blogger outreach or something that fits in with what they are covering.

The main thing we have to remember is that bloggers are not a part of the media industry, and as a result, they are not expecting many of the day-to-day things that reporters wouldn’t bat an eye at.

That said, pitching media with a blanket release is just as silly as pitching bloggers… it’s just less confusing for them.  In all cases, your value as a PR person is about the number of relationships you have created… not about how many press releases you send.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

6 Responses to “Are we all just spammers at heart?”
  1. Eric Meyer 8 May 2007 at 8:25 pm #

    My experience with MediaMap (back in 2005) was that somebody, quite probably Barron’s themselves, had added me to a press release database without my knowledge, let alone my consent. And then I started getting unsolicited press releases via e-mail. So yes, it’s a new style of spam. Spam isn’t just Cialis free diploma 419 scams sent to millions of addresses. It’s any unsolicited commerical e-mail. Unwanted press releases obviously count.

    Now, were I to sign myself up with MediaMap or Cision or whatever, then no, it isn’t spam. In such a case, I’ve asked for the material, at least indirectly. The point is that I hadn’t.

    And that’s something that PR folks need to be aware of and think hard about when they consider using services like Cision. Unless a service is relentlessly opt-in, by which I mean they not only require people listed in their database to sign up but also to confirm via e-mail that they want to be signed up, there is a non-zero chance that you’ll end up sending commerical e-mail to someone who never asked for it. And that’s spamming. The service itself is very much to blame, but the people who keep them in business by paying them and using their data despite their questionable tactics share the blame.

  2. Ryan 8 May 2007 at 9:41 pm #

    You’re right Eric. From my point of view, however, when I started seeing bloggers show up in my Vocus database alongside regular media outlets, I naturally assumed that they were vetted, asked if they wanted to be a part of the database and that they had provided the information in the database.

    Thing is, it’s almost impossible to do media relations without such a database of media people – it’s just one of the tools of the trade, like email or a blog.

    I think there also has to be a distinction between sending a press release to someone who hasn’t opted in and contacting a blogger to ask if they want to be part of a campaign – a product sample, review, whatever. I get press releases too (mostly from hip hop promoters, for some reason) and they bug the hell out of me. I also get asked to review books and things every once and a while, and I have no problem with it because it’s a personal communication. Yes, it’s unsolicited and commercial, but I don’t consider it spam.

    That said, spam is in the eye of the beholder, and it’s an important thing to remember before hitting send.

  3. Heather Yaxley 9 May 2007 at 3:18 am #

    Ryan – I do think that blanket mailing is lazy PR. Whichever way you look at it, simply using a database of unknown contacts is direct mail – and likely to be viewed as spam or unwanted by many receivers.

    PR has to move away from this scattergun approach of hoping for a small percentage uptake regardless of the impact on the larger proportion who delete or ignore your communications.

    We should focus more on quality than quantity – especially when it comes to bloggers and other online influencers. We have to earn the right to engage in the conversation – and you don’t do that by sending unsolicited, unfocused press release-style communications.

  4. Eric Meyer 9 May 2007 at 4:33 pm #

    From my point of view, however, when I started seeing bloggers show up in my Vocus database alongside regular media outlets, I naturally assumed that they were vetted, asked if they wanted to be a part of the database and that they had provided the information in the database.

    Understandable; but now you know better, and I think it’s important that all PR folks hear about this so that they know better. And it would be really nice if the various database maintainers were pressured to make their databases confirmed opt-in, not just simple sign-up. That way your initial assumption would be correct, and you wouldn’t be an unwitting party to spamming.

    I think there also has to be a distinction between sending a press release to someone who hasn’t opted in and contacting a blogger to ask if they want to be part of a campaign – a product sample, review, whatever.

    I agree with you on that. The former is spam; the latter is asking if someone would like to opt in to a mailing list. Of course, the latter can get awfully close to spammishness if someone buys a list of a gazillion addresses and auto-mails them all to ask if they’d like to opt in.

    Anyway, I’d be happy with the outcome if it became widely known in the PR industry that PR databases can (and do) contain people who never asked to be in the databse, and that PR folks should closely question database providers on their inclusion policies to make sure they won’t become unwitting spammers.

  5. [...] the New PR from Ryan Anderson looks at PR as a profession and debates whether or not if we’re really spammers at heart. God, another article that once again demonstrates how bad many of the practitioners in this [...]

  6. [...] 1. Не спамьте. Лучше разошлите релиз журналистам, с которыми знакомы. С персональным обращением. Эффект будет выше, чем рассылка по тысяче неизвестных журналистов. “В конце концов, ценность пиарщика – в том, сколько контактов он смог завязать, а не в том, сколько пресс-релизов он разослал”, – Райан Андерсон. [...]

Leave a Reply